set-octavation bug?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

set-octavation bug?

Orm Finnendahl
Hi,

something seems completely wrong here:

\version "2.11.7"

\relative c'''' {
#(set-octavation 1)
b4~
#(set-octavation 2)
b4~
#(set-octavation 1)
b4~
#(set-octavation 0)
b4
 }

all pitches should be the same (and lilypond obviously thinks so as it
prints the slurs) but the octaves are messed up as if the
set-octavation function worked in some sort of relative mode.

--
Orm


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: set-octavation bug?

Graham Percival-2
Orm Finnendahl wrote:

> \version "2.11.7"
>
> \relative c'''' {
> #(set-octavation 1)
> b4~
> #(set-octavation 2)
> b4~
> #(set-octavation 1)
> b4~
> #(set-octavation 0)
> b4
>  }

Wow, that's weird.  Entered as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=236

BTW, bug reports normally go to the bugs list.

Cheers,
- Graham


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel